(Sub-Saharan) Paths of PraxisSupport

Morilhat

Claude Morilhat · Philosophy

Appears in 3 videos · 10 passages, 8 of them in depth.

What Dominique Pagani says

Dominique Pagani discusses Claude Morilhat in connection with a review of Clouscard published in 1987 in Société française. He presents it as the first published recognition of Clouscard1; in 2022, he links it to the Espace Marx2. He regards Morilhat as an honest reader of Clouscard3 and devotes two sessions in 2019 to the reply Clouscard addressed to him. He sums up Morilhat's judgement with the formula "indispensable and insufficient"4, which in 2022 he reports as "unavoidable but insufficient". He sets out Morilhat's criticisms: a shifting vocabulary, work done "with an axe"5, and a broad-brush sketch that is hard to tell apart from caricature, notably of the maîtres à penser6. Morilhat also objects that taking potlatch or the totem out of their field is not enough to give them a conceptual dimension7. In 2022, he reduces this objection to a cultural relativism for which potlatch would hold only for Native Americans8.

  1. 1D. Pagani / Réponse de M. Clouscard à C. Morilhat • Seconde Partie10 Sept 2019 · 21:42
  2. 2Clouscard et le problème de Socrate14 Oct 2022 · 3:34
  3. 3D. Pagani / Réponse de M. Clouscard à C. Morilhat (1987)23 Aug 2019 · 3:20
  4. 4D. Pagani / Réponse de M. Clouscard à C. Morilhat (1987)23 Aug 2019 · 20:36
  5. 5D. Pagani / Réponse de M. Clouscard à C. Morilhat (1987)23 Aug 2019 · 39:59
  6. 6D. Pagani / Réponse de M. Clouscard à C. Morilhat • Seconde Partie10 Sept 2019 · 39:25
  7. 7D. Pagani / Réponse de M. Clouscard à C. Morilhat • Seconde Partie10 Sept 2019 · 1:08:07
  8. 8Clouscard et le problème de Socrate14 Oct 2022 · 17:10

Summary produced automatically from 9 of the passages below, to be reviewed; the numbers link to the moment in the session.

Series · 10 Sept 2019D. Pagani / M. Clouscard's reply to C. Morilhat • Part Two
  1. 21:42In 1987, he is the first to publish an acknowledgment of Clouscard, judged "indispensable and insufficient."
  2. 39:25He criticizes Clouscard for a work with the axe that borders on caricature of the masters of thought.
  3. 1:08:07In his view, taking potlatch or totem out of their field is not enough to give them a conceptual dimension.
  4. 1:28:20He criticizes Clouscard for an instrumental interpretation of the State and a misreading of the struggle for management.

Search any author, concept or word across all of Dominique Pagani's videos and writings