Summary
Dominique Pagani approaches antisemitism mainly through the Nietzsche-Wagner case. He rejects the picture of a progressive Nietzsche set against a reactionary Wagner: in his view, the only parts of Nazism found in Wagner are antisemitism and nationalism, while Nietzsche carries almost all its other themes12. Drawing on Losurdo, he argues that Nietzsche becomes philosemitic only after his break with Wagner, and he points out that in a letter of 1872 the "Jewish press" became the "Socratic press" in the Colli-Montinari edition1. He explains Wagner's virulent antisemitism by his resentment, in Paris, towards Meyerbeer, who was blocking his career. He also recalls that Wiesenthal acknowledged Wagner's generosity and genius, and he mentions Wagner's Jewish stepfather, Geyer, who may have been his father2. He returns to the subject in 2024 through the memory of a friend who heard Jewish chants in Mime's lament, and ends on the narrow path between support for Israel and antisemitism3.
- 1#12 Nietzsche (right up) against Wagner28 Jan 2021
- 2#9.15 How can sciences of history be real?18 Feb 2021
- 3The eternal return… of the death camps?13 Oct 2024
Introduction produced automatically from the 4 sessions on this theme, to be reviewed; the numbers link to the sessions.
The 4 videos
Cycle 13The eternal return… of the death camps?
13 Oct 2024If everything is determined and returns eternally, is philosophy, which asks the question "what must I do?", still possible, and can one still deliver a message against evil?
Cycle 9.2#9.15 How can sciences of history be real?
18 Feb 2021How does a mythic narrative such as Wagner's Ring, taken at its midpoint, reveal a rigorous logic, an "algebra" of gold and love, that the sciences of history and culture can bring out?
Musicosophie#12 Nietzsche (right up) against Wagner
28 Jan 2021What does the conflict between Nietzsche and Wagner reveal, once we reread Nietzsche's texts while listening to the music?
At the Tropiques bookshopArendt and Heidegger: the destruction of thought
24 Sept 2020What relation unites Arendt's conception of Nazism and totalitarianism with Heidegger's conception of thought, and how has this relation served to exonerate Heidegger and Schmitt?