Series · 7 Feb 2021Musicosophy 14. Mozart once more- 1:09:18Enjoyment can be of an almost infinite intensity, but it is fleeting and evanescent: it is its relation to time that distinguishes it from happiness.
Worked through in 7 videos · 12 passages.
Dominique Pagani defines jouissance first of all by its relation to time. It can reach an almost infinite intensity, but it is fleeting and evanescent, and this lack of duration is what distinguishes it from happiness1. It "is not conjugated in the imperfect tense": its seriousness is death and flight2. He places it among intensive magnitudes in Kant's sense3. On the historical and social level, he links it to the aristocratic master and the libertine4. He associates it with use value, and the king's favourite is its figure: the king enjoys what he has extorted, just as surplus value is extorted56. At the end of the eighteenth century, it stops being reserved for aristocrats7. He contrasts it with Rousseau's measured and austere jouissance, which he describes as sublimated libido8. In music, he sees its irruption in Fauré, Debussy and Ravel, which he links to deathly romanticism9.
Summary produced automatically from 12 of the passages below, to be reviewed; the numbers link to the moment in the session.
Series · 7 Feb 2021Musicosophy 14. Mozart once more
Series · 2 Feb 2021Musicosophy 13. Mozart restored
Series · 11 Jan 2021Musicosophy 8. Happiness and unhappiness in music
Series · 11 Dec 2020Musicosophy 5. Happiness versus the death drive in music
Season 3 · 1 Aug 2017#3.3 From Ulysses to Daedalus
Talks · 19 Jun 2016At the bistro with Pagani: part 2
Series · 29 Jan 2016What is to be done? 1/3