Cycle 15 · 28 Aug 2026From Copernicus to Lenin: revolution!- 24:37The philosopher most widespread in the dominant ideology; his falsifiability is not an invention, it has been agreed upon for 2500 years.
Appears in 21 videos · 26 passages, 8 of them in depth.
Dominique Pagani mainly returns to the reading of the history of philosophy that Popper gives in The Open Society and Its Enemies: there Plato, Rousseau and Hegel become totalitarian thinkers, which, in his view, amounts to making all of philosophy totalitarian1. He reproaches him for forgetting that the whole is not totalitarian2, for never having read Hegel, and for setting against him Locke, who justified slavery3. He places him, together with Bobbio, among the proponents of a dichotomous logic of friends and enemies of freedom, tied to Atlanticism and the Cold War4. On falsifiability, he answers that it has been known since Aristotle and Euclid, and he refuses to make the hard sciences the model for all knowledge. In the more recent sessions, he makes Popper the figure of the dominant neopositivism and of scientistic naturalism, whose targets are Marx and Freud, and whose "open society" passes over in silence the massacres in Vietnam and Korea56.
Summary produced automatically from 26 of the passages below, to be reviewed; the numbers link to the moment in the session.
Sir Karl Raimund Popper (28 July 1902 – 17 September 1994) was an Austrian–British philosopher, academic and social commentator. One of the 20th century's most influential philosophers of science, Popper is known for his rejection of the classical inductivist views on the scientific method in favour of empirical falsification made possible by his falsifiability criterion, and for founding the Department of Philosophy at the London School of Economics and Political Science. […]
Read the article on WikipediaText: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0, excerpt
Cycle 15 · 28 Aug 2026From Copernicus to Lenin: revolution!
Cycle 9.2 · 7 Jan 2021#9.11 How can sciences of history be real?
Cycle 9.1 · 3 Dec 2020#7 Answers to questions (continued)
Cycle 6 · 3 Dec 2019#6.2 The logic of the subject in the face of the reconstitution of Nazism
Talks · 2 Jul 2018Tribute to Domenico Losurdo
Talks · 2 Jul 2018The Phenomenology of Spirit
Cycle 2 · 18 Feb 2016#2.3 Between crisis and war: philosophising?
Series · 2 Feb 2016Hegel on the Beach 5/5
Talks · 23 May 2026Neo-fascism and the ideology of desire: is Michel Clouscard still relevant?
Cycle 14 · 21 Oct 2025The silences of the media uproar: the Atlanticist re-Nazification
Cycle 13 · 17 Dec 2024The essence of evil: innocence of nature, horror of naturalism!
Cycle 11 · 29 Jun 2023Worldliness in Clouscard: Aragon and the positivity of the negative
Cycle 9.2 · 27 May 2021#9.22 Science and/or philosophy of “artificial intelligence” (part 2)
Series · 7 Feb 2021#14 Mozart once more
Talks · 24 Sept 2020Arendt and Heidegger: the destruction of thought
Cycle 7 · 27 Mar 2020#1 Harnessed to confinitude
Cycle 5.1 · 21 Nov 2018#5.2 The philosopher's Odyssey: revolutionary thought
Cycle 2 · 15 Feb 2016#2.2 Between crisis and war: philosophising?
Series · 29 Jan 2016What is to be done? 3/3
Series · 29 Jan 2016What is to be done? 2/3
Series · 8 Dec 2015Michel Clouscard, the paths of praxis (1/2)