(Sub-Saharan) Paths of PraxisSupport

Mathematical discourse

discours mathématique

Worked through in 5 videos · 6 passages.

What Dominique Pagani says

Dominique Pagani distinguishes mathematical discourse from language: it is discursive without being a language, because it excludes metaphor and remains univocal12. The mathematician leaves behind the ambiguities of words for a language of signs in which one advances in safety3. He sees in it the origin of a split specific to Western thought: an epistemic discourse that renounces ordinary language, as when the notion of weight replaces the qualities of heavy and light4. He holds mathematics to be the hard science par excellence, but not a science of nature: it is the logic of the arbitrary object5. He situates philosophy in relation to this model. The philosopher seeks the same rigour, but with everyday words1, and philosophy has no need of mathematical formalisation6. Formalisation nonetheless remains central within mathematical discourse itself2.

  1. 1Keller (Helen)15 Feb 2016 · 1:31:43
  2. 2Mann (Thomas)23 Oct 2019 · 1:36:40
  3. 3Langage et pensée : Le cas Lavoisier13 Apr 2026 · 36:58
  4. 4Que faire ? 2/329 Jan 2016 · 50:16
  5. 5#9 Bien-et Mé-faits de l'amnésie...17 Dec 2020 · 39:40
  6. 6#9 Bien-et Mé-faits de l'amnésie...17 Dec 2020 · 1:46:12

Summary produced automatically from 6 of the passages below, to be reviewed; the numbers link to the moment in the session.

Search any author, concept or word across all of Dominique Pagani's videos and writings